808 Audio Performer BT Wireless Headphone Review
Not a world-beater in any one category, but they bundle decent value for the price.
Wires are for the birds. In today's world of curved smartphones and transforming laptops, it feels archaic to have headphones that keep you permanently tethered in place all the time—but sometimes you want better sound than Bluetooth offers, too.
The 808 Audio Performer BT (MSRP $99) over-ear headphones wear both hats. They function as both wireless, Bluetooth over-ears for mobile music-lovers and wired, desk-tethered cans for stationary listeners who want CD-quality audio.
It's a lot to provide for a very reasonable price, so naturally, there are some drawbacks here. The materials are not as fine as in higher-end headphones, meaning they're not the most comfortable, wearable cans on the market. The sound quality is similar—it's good enough for most listeners, especially if you enjoy a good bass emphasis, but is missing some of the finer details and resonance you might find from more expensive options.
For the price, however, the Performer BTs offer up a good enough combo of features (via dual wired/wireless functionality) and sound that they're not a bad value by any means—for $99, it's hard to complain about them. If you're really invested in high-end sound and don't mind paying a little more for the freedom offered by dual Bluetooth/wired headphones, check out the Sony MDR-1ABTs instead.
Design & Usability
An esoteric design approach that's sure to turn a few heads.
You'd be hard-pressed to call the Performer BT over-ears "traditional." Their brushed, metallic band is highlighted by sections of black rubber that run along in rectangular segments. Each ear cup is emblazoned with a honeycombed "808" logo and decorated by an octagonal pattern of criss-crossing string. It's a unique, industrial sort of design that doesn't leave a ton of room for plushy padding or lavish materials.
The Performer BTs are lightweight and flexible, but the materials definitely feel cheaper than higher-end over-ear headphones. Each ear cup pivots by 45° to the front and back of the band, which is good news for DJs: By twisting one cup forward or backward, you can listen with one ear without sacrificing any of the band's grip strength. The cups extend a few inches from the band, as well, but I still found it difficult to get a good seal. If the band curved and gripped just a little harder, bass would definitely have more of a presence in the sound.
These cans include a standard three-foot detachable cable with an in-line, single-button mic/remote combo and a USB charger for the Bluetooth battery. The audio cable plugs into the left ear cup; you'll find the Bluetooth charging port and controls on the right, alongside a small power button/indicator. The back of the right ear cup disguises controls for playing/pausing wireless music and adjusting volume (relative to the source volume, of course).
It's easy to just plug these cans in and get listening. It takes a little more setup to take advantage of the wireless Bluetooth audio. Once the Performer BTs are charged up (a full charge takes about an hour), pressing the power button on the right ear cup boots up Bluetooth.
I connected to the Performer BTs using a Macbook Air and listened to Pandora. While the audio quality was obviously a little worse than during a wired connection (discussed in the next section), connecting to the 808s was easy. I was able to walk about 100 feet away, with a number of walls in between my laptop and the headphones, before the signal started to fade.
The volume buttons on the back of the right ear cup worked as they should have, but when I pressed the play/pause button, it opened up iTunes—meaning it interacts directly with the connected device's interface, and not with specific programs. That's a standard result, however, and won't be a problem on smartphones.
A good enough sound for most listeners, but not what we'd call high-end.
Whether you're listening wirelessly over Bluetooth or plugged into desktop speakers, you want the best sound. Obviously, the Performer BTs don't compete with more expensive, wired over-ear headphones in some regards. The sound profile is good enough for most listeners, but there are some flaws here that purists will definitely want to know about before courting these cans.
First of all, testing revealed a frequency response that gives a mostly even, flat emphasis to sub-bass, with light bass boosting that tapers off a bit in midrange and upper-midrange frequencies. This means music resonates with a decent low-end presence and the "meat" of most songs, such as vocals, guitar, and drum hits sound as they should. Bass will sound best if you can get a good seal, but that varies from person to person.
Emphasis drops off sharply in the highest midrange and treble frequencies, however, where a few instruments such as piccolo and cymbals live. While this reduces the occasionally harshness of those instruments, it also leaves a bit to be desired in terms of overtones and overall harmonic resonance. The full-bodied sound you aim for when you pay a few hundred dollars for headphones simply isn't present here.
In terms of functional performance, the Performer BTs fare a little better, though there are elements here, too, that consumers should be wary of. On the plus side, these headphones remain mostly distortion free even at very high volumes, but with the caveat that distortion is essentially always present in small amounts in bass and sub-bass elements. Most listeners won't be overly bothered by this, but keep in mind it becomes a bigger issue when listening wirelessly over Bluetooth and may bother the golden-eared crowd.
There's also a small issue with volume balance between the left and right channels. Higher pitches, such as from cymbals or overblown wind instruments, tend to sound out a little bit louder in the left channel than the right channel. The discrepancy here is small—again, most listeners won't notice this during music—but it might become apparent if you listen to a lot of talk shows or podcasts.
Finally, the somewhat loose seal of the Performer BTs mean they don't block out ambient noise as well as they could. People around you won't be able to hear your music (unless it's excessively loud), but you will still hear bassy, thumping sounds around you like footsteps, engines, and bus horns.
They fill a particular niche, but the individual parts could be better.
The 808 Audio Performer BTs check off a lot of the right boxes. They offer up a unique appearance, a compact (travel-friendly) frame, and dual wired/wireless functionality for just $99. That's much less than you'd normally pay for over-ear headphones with the same functionality, setting them up as a unique option in the market.
Where you're saving money, however, you're also sacrificing a bit by way of audio quality and durability. Testing revealed that the Performer BTs simply lack the full, resonant sound of more expensive, traditional over-ears. Further, the lightweight metal band lacks the contour to properly clutch around the ears, leading to some unwanted ambient interference.
If you can live with less-than-perfect audio and are dead-set on cans that dual-wield wireless mobility and wired reliability, you should check these out—but try to find them on sale. If you're willing to pay a little more for that high-end sound, you're probably going to have to jump into an entirely different price bracket or opt to remain permanently wired.
Get Our Newsletter
Real advice from real experts. Sign up for our newsletter
Thanks for signing up!